Tuesday, July 18, 2006

On the topic of how insubstantial beauty is, let me provide exhibit A, below. Just because Pamela Anderson is attractive, does not mean she demands that her mate, the alluringly-named "Kid Rock" be equally attractive, nor even remotely attractive for that matter:

3 Comments:

At 11:30 AM, Blogger Stephanie said...

To me, Pamela Anderson is actually just as unattractive as Kid Rock. Two peas in a pod. Not a very nice thing to say, but I find them both caricatures of the grotesque.

 
At 11:46 AM, Blogger Jordan E. Rosenfeld said...

I actually agree with you; but culturally, Pam Anderson is accepted as "beautiful" and the point I didn't really make was that the outside "shell" of her "beauty" doesn't mean that she is thusly drawn to beauty.

I dunno

 
At 1:32 PM, Blogger Stephanie said...

I see what you're saying. :) And I did read her book.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home